Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)

Director Of Tribal Welfare, Government ... vs Laveti Giri And Another on 18 April, 1995

11. Though, the learned counsel for the petitioner referring to the decision of apex Court in Ku. Madhuri Patil's case (supra), particularly Para 5 and 6 thereof, has contended that the Committee has not conducted its proceedings strictly in accordance with the directions of the apex Court, however, we do find any substance in this plea because a perusal of order dated 22.10.2016 passed by the Committee clearly reveals that the information with regard to caste and domicile status of the petitioner was procured from all sources including revenue officials and senior police officials. Apart this, the petitioner was given opportunity to explain as to how he had procured certificate dated 27.7.2003, however, he miserably failed to offer any plausible explanation in that regard. As held by the apex Court in Director of Tribal Welfare, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh vs. Laveti & another, (1995) 4 SCC 32, the burden to prove that the certificate with regard to caste is genuine, is always on the candidate. The fact remains that the certificates with regard to birth-place, caste, etc. submitted by the petitioner along with his reply have all been procured after the 9 W.P. No.1146/2017 commencement of the inquiry by the Committee. One document which inspires confidence and prevailed upon the Committee and which equally commends us, is the certificate, which was filed by the petitioner at the time of his admission in MBBS Course and which has been issued on 28.4.2008 by Additional Collector, Sagar, wherein the residence of petitioner with his parentage, is clearly stated as Devri (Patharia), Tehsil Devri, District Sagar. Needless to state that though the certificate was issued stating that Bhagwandas @ Bhagwani (maternal grandfather of the petitioner) resident of Karrapur, Sagar is a freedom fighter, however, in the subsequent paragraphs, the entries including name, parentage, and residence are with regard to the petitioner and the certificate was procured by the petitioner to demonstrate that he is grandson of Bhagwandas @ Bhagwani.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 164 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1