Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.17 seconds)

J.R.R. Naidu vs Registrar, City Civil Courts on 7 August, 1991

16. In the instant case, since defendant No.8 (petitioner herein) was deleted from the array of parties and also the petitioner has suffered an order by way of rejection of IA. 52 in O.S 7938/1996, the petitioner is not entitled for relief as sought for in this petition. The petitioner has relied upon the law declared by this Court in the case of J.R.R. NAIDU (supra). The facts of the case in the above decision are distinct from the facts of the case on hand. The party seeking certified copies in the above mentioned decision was party in the proceedings therein. However, in the instant case, the petitioner is neither a party in the preliminary decree nor a party in the final decree proceedings and in that view of the matter, aforesaid judgment relied upon by the petitioner is not applicable to the facts of the present case, as said case deal with the party to the proceedings 16 and accordingly, the contention raised by the learned counsel for the respondent is accepted. Hence, Writ petition is rejected as having no merit. However, dismissal of instant writ petition does not disentitle the petitioner to prove the conduct of the parties in O.S 6345/2005 in a manner known to law and it is always open for him to take necessary steps in the said suit. Hence, the following:
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1