cites: 28408495

M/S Galaxy Transport ... vs M/S New J.K. Roadways,Fleet Owners And ... on 18 December, 2020

25. This Court referred to various decisions on the subject and stated the legal principles as follows : (Galaxy Transport Agencies case [Galaxy Transport Agencies v. New J.K. Roadways, Fleet Owners & Transport Contractors, (2021) 16 SCC 808 : 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1035] , SCC paras 14-20) ***

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 73 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Afcons Infrastructure Ltd vs Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. & Anr on 15 September, 2016

81. Afcons (supra) also re-emphasised that interference in a tender/contract is permissible if a Court finds arbitrariness or irrationality or finds it perverse. In this matter, as adumbrated above, the Court finds the disqualification of petitioner, based on reasons given, as being perverse, arbitrary and irrational.

Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 560 - M B Lokur - Full Document

Section 2 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 362

Section 4 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 193

Section 6 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 397

Section 13 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 67

Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994

In this regard, paragraphs 93 and 94 of Tata Cellular (supra) are extracted as under for quick reference:

Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 3275 - S Mohan - Full Document

M/S Agmatel India Private Limited vs M/S Resoursys Telecom on 31 January, 2022

Relevant paragraphs of Agmatel (supra) are extracted as under:

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 73 - D Maheshwari - Full Document

Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs M/S Anoj Kumar Agarwala on 23 January, 2019

61. Petitioner also contends that there was no relaxation of the conditions, as had been contemplated in Vidarbha Irrigation (supra), being cited by the respondent.

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 49 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Bakshi Security And Personnel Services ... vs Devkishan Computed Pvt Ltd And Ors on 26 July, 2016

In Bakshi Security & Personnel Services (P) Ltd. v. Devkishan Computed (P) Ltd. [Bakshi Security & Personnel Services (P) Ltd. v. Devkishan Computed (P) Ltd., (2016) 8 SCC 446] , this Court held : (SCC p. 453, paras 14-16) "14. The law is settled that an essential condition of a tender has to be strictly complied Signature Not Verified W.P. (C) No. 792/2025 and W.P. (C) No. 800/2025 Page 11 of 32 Digitally Signed By:MANISH KUMAR Signing Date:01.08.2025 18:57:36 with.

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 164 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results