Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)

Smt. Pushpa Sareen vs State Of U.P. on 12 February, 2015

29. In the present case, it is admitted case of the petitioners that they had bought the land in question not for agricultural purposes, but for household (Grihasti) purposes and in fact within a few months, they had started construction of the houses on the said land, which is evident from the report of the Collector dated 11.8.2006. The Collector (Stamp) has determined the true market value of the property after considering the relevant factors as mentioned above in the said judgement of Smt. Pushpa Sareen (supra).
Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 87 - Full Document
1   2 Next