Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.23 seconds)Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 142 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
M/S. Rahul Builders vs M/S. Arihant Fertilizers & Chemical & ... on 2 November, 2007
He also
relied on the decision in Rahul Builders v Arihand Fertilizers and
Chemicals [2007 (4) KLT 977 (SC)]. In reply, the learned counsel
for the appellant said that the cheque amount has been specifically
demanded in the Ext.P4 notice and the learned Magistrate did not
appreciate the contentions of the parties in proper perspective and
therefore, the judgment warrants interference in appeal and he
prayed for convicting the first respondent under Section 138 of the
Act. He also prayed for granting appropriate amount as
compensation to the appellant.
Suman Sethi vs Ajay K, Churiwal on 2 February, 2000
In support of the contention that the notice does not satisfy
Section 138(b) of the Act, the learned counsel relied on the decision
reported in Suman Sethi v Ajay [2000 (1) KLT 701 (SC)].
1