Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.27 seconds)Ritu Duggal & Anr. vs Unitech Reliable Projects Pvt. Ltd. on 1 February, 2016
In this regard, we place our reliance on the Judgment of Hon'ble National Commission rendered in the matter of Ritu Duggal and another Vs. Unitech Reliable Projects Pvt., Ltd., in CC No.1521 of 2015, decided on 01.02.2016.
Anshu Shrivastava vs Unitech Limited on 30 June, 2016
ii) Judgment of Hon'ble NCDRC, New Delhi rendered in the matter of Anshu Shrivastava & Anr Vs. Unitech Ltd., reported in IV (2016) CPJU 462 (NC), wherein it was held that aggregate of the amounts claimed forms the pecuniary jurisdiction.
Haryana Urban Development Authority vs Pawan Kumar Gupta on 10 July, 2013
A similar case in a decision rendered by the Hon'ble National Commission in Haryana Urban Development Authority Vs. Pawan Kumar Gupta, reported in SC & National Commission Consumer Law Cases (2005-2006), observing that in cases of this nature, the complaint was within the time limit as there was continuous cause of action.
Mr. Golam Mohiuddin vs The Abs Land Development And ... on 14 January, 2016
i) Judgment of Hon'ble NCDRC, New Delhi rendered in the matter of G.Mohiuddin Vs. ABS Land Development and Constructions, reported in IV-2016 CPJ 621 NC, wherein it was held that aggregate value of goods agreed to be paid by consumer and amount claimed as compensation will determine the pecuniary jurisdiction.
M/S Sreemitra Developers P. Ltd vs K Venkateshwar Rao on 15 May, 2015
vi) Another Judgment of Hon'ble NCDRC, New Delhi rendered in Fa No.890 of 2012 in the matter of Sreemitra Developers Pvt., Ltd., Vs. K.Venkateswara Rao, wherein it was held that since developers failed to provide the amenities as per the brochure, the developer is liable to refund the amount along with interest and compensation.
1