Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)Navnath Siddhappa Koli vs Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ... on 9 April, 1981
In coming to this conclusion, this Court followed its earlier decision in Navnath S. Koli v. Shri Siddheswar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana, 1981 83 Born LR 470,(supra) wherein it had been laid down that, unless the Labour Court came to the conclusion that there was an unfair labour practice, within the meaning of one or the other item in the Schedule, engaged in, the Court could grant relief merely on the allegation that the order complained of was otherwise illegal or improper. This proposition is well-settled and beyond cavil. But, the question is whether the Labour Court has interfered in the instant case, without there being an unfair labour practice. In paragraph 11 of the impugned order, the Labour Court has recorded its finding that the facts brought on record, in the background circumstances of the case, amounted to an unfair labour practice on the part of, the petitioners.
Maharashtra State Road Transport ... vs Niranjan Shridhar Gade And Anr. on 14 September, 1984
In view of this clear finding of the Labour Court on the question of unfair labour practice, the judgment in Niranjan Gade's case (supra) would be of no avail to the Petitioners.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Air India Corporation, Bombay vs V. A. Rebellow & Anr on 24 February, 1972
Undoubtedly, in the circumstances which were present before the Supreme Court in Rebello's case, there was no occasion for the industrial adjudicator to take any different view on the issue of loss of confidence. Even the Tribunal had found that it was a case of bonafide loss of confidence.
Section 28 in The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
1