East Delhi Municipal Corporation vs Pratibha Sharma on 2 July, 2019
14. During the pendency of this O.A., it is admitted by
both sides that the applicant has already crossed the age of
65 years. Thus, learned counsel for the applicant instead
pressed for the relief to grant of salary etc. for the period
for which the applicant actually had not worked pursuant to
his relieving from the services of the Respondent-Institute,
10
OA No. 63/2018, OA No. 334/2018, OA No. 335/2018 & OA No. 421/2019 with MA No. 651/2019
in which he was continuing to work beyond the age of 60
years merely because of the status quo granted by this
Tribunal, which was later on revoked by this Tribunal.
Learned counsel for the applicant cited the order of the
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi dated 19.11.2019 passed in the
case of East Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Dr.
Pratibha Sharma [Cont. CAS (C) No. 533/2019] (supra),
which reads as follows: -