Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.32 seconds)Ram Babu Tiwari vs State Of M.P.& Ors on 24 April, 2009
12. It has also been held in Ram Babu Vs. State of M.P. 2011 (2)
Crimes 193 (M.P.) that:
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 341 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 354 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 354A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 354B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Gorige Pentaiah vs State Of A.P. & Ors on 20 August, 2008
11. Now as far as calling somebody as "Chinki" cannot be said to be a
castiest word which is punishable under the SC and ST Act. I have perused the
Sessions Case No. 35/14 Page 4 of 13
first complaint made by the victim/complainant on 28/02/2014 and in that
complaint she has stated as follows : "I belonged to scheduled tribe that is why
I was molested." No where in the entire complaint the complainant has
mentioned that the accused was not a member of Scheduled Caste and
Scheduled Tribe, by simply alleging in the complaint that the complainant
belonged to a Scheduled Tribe that is why she was molested is not enough to
bring the case within the purview of Section 3 of the SC and ST Act. Reliance
can be placed upon Gorige Pentaiah Vs. State of A.P. & Others, 2009 CRI.
L.J. 350 in which it was held as follows :
Section 3 in The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
1