Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.28 seconds)
Ramesh vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 20 December, 2017 cites

Bishan Singh, Gurdial Singh, Hardial ... vs The State Of Punjab on 9 August, 1973

"20. We find that the writ petitioner or the appellant have no right to claim allotment of dwelling units merely for the reason that they were in the waiting list. Firstly, sub-clause (iii) of Clause XV clearly stipulates that mere submission of an application form shall not entitle the applicant to the allotment of a unit. Such is the settled principle of law, as laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab, (1979)81 PLR 413 as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chaman Lal Singhal v. Haryana Urban Development Authority & others (2009) 4 SCC 369 and Greater Mohali Area Development Authority and others v. Manju Jain and others, (2010) 9 SCC 157.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 389 - Full Document

Chaman Lal Singhal vs Haryana Urban Dev. Authority & Ors on 9 February, 2009

"20. We find that the writ petitioner or the appellant have no right to claim allotment of dwelling units merely for the reason that they were in the waiting list. Firstly, sub-clause (iii) of Clause XV clearly stipulates that mere submission of an application form shall not entitle the applicant to the allotment of a unit. Such is the settled principle of law, as laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab, (1979)81 PLR 413 as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chaman Lal Singhal v. Haryana Urban Development Authority & others (2009) 4 SCC 369 and Greater Mohali Area Development Authority and others v. Manju Jain and others, (2010) 9 SCC 157.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 59 - M Sharma - Full Document

Greater Mohali Area Dev. Authority & Ors vs Manju Jain & Ors on 19 August, 2010

"20. We find that the writ petitioner or the appellant have no right to claim allotment of dwelling units merely for the reason that they were in the waiting list. Firstly, sub-clause (iii) of Clause XV clearly stipulates that mere submission of an application form shall not entitle the applicant to the allotment of a unit. Such is the settled principle of law, as laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab, (1979)81 PLR 413 as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chaman Lal Singhal v. Haryana Urban Development Authority & others (2009) 4 SCC 369 and Greater Mohali Area Development Authority and others v. Manju Jain and others, (2010) 9 SCC 157.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 124 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Amarpreet Singh Deol vs Chandigarh Housing Board And Ors on 29 October, 2014

The issue was considered in greater detail in another decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Amarpreet Singh Deol v. Chandigarh Housing Board 2014(28) R.C.R.(Civil) 893. In this case it had been argued on behalf of the wait list applicants that their claim to allotment could not be defeated on account of the inaction of the respondents in not cancelling the allotment of the ineligible applicants within the period of the validity of waiting list. It was argued that it was incumbent on the respondents to finalize such cancellation within the period of the validity of the waiting list. This argument was rejected by observing as under:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - H Gupta - Full Document
1