Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.23 seconds)Section 2 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The United Commercial Bank ... vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,West ... on 23 May, 1957
18. The principle so propounded by the House of Lords was adopted by the Supreme Court in this country in United Commercial Batik Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, [1957] 52 I.T.R. 688 ; [1958] S.C.R. 79 (S.C.).
The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950
Income Tax Rules, 1962
East India Housing And Land Development ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West ... on 2 November, 1960
and E. I. Housing & Land Development Trust v. Commissioner of Income-tax, [1961] 42 I.T.R. 49 (S.C.). .
Ram Bilas Radhey Sham vs Sales Tax Officer, Iii, Kanpur on 14 November, 1961
In Radhey Shyam v. Agricultural Income-tax Officer, [1955] A.L J. 325 (All.) Daval J. held that, apart from the declaration enacted by Section 3 of the U. P. Agricultural Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1953, the word "person" in Section 2(11) makes no reference to the period and time when the person should have owned or held property. In his view it was not necessary at all that during the year of assessment a person must own or hold property in order to attract Section 3.
Section 44 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
1