Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.47 seconds)

Sohanlal Surajaram Visnoi vs State Of Gujarat on 6 June, 2003

4.1 I am, therefore, of the view that the detaining authority has passed the order of detention without there being any credible or cogent material on record in this behalf. I have considered factual and legal aspects emerging from the record of the petition and considered the rival submissions and the facts of the case and also considered the judgment of this Court in the case of Sohanlal Sujaram Visnoi (Supra) and Sandip Gupta(supra). In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and also ratio laid down in the cases mentioned above, the order of detention cannot be sustained and it deserves to be quashed and set aside.
Gujarat High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 58 - Full Document

Sandip Omprakash Gupta vs State Of Gujarat on 11 June, 2003

4.1 I am, therefore, of the view that the detaining authority has passed the order of detention without there being any credible or cogent material on record in this behalf. I have considered factual and legal aspects emerging from the record of the petition and considered the rival submissions and the facts of the case and also considered the judgment of this Court in the case of Sohanlal Sujaram Visnoi (Supra) and Sandip Gupta(supra). In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and also ratio laid down in the cases mentioned above, the order of detention cannot be sustained and it deserves to be quashed and set aside.
Gujarat High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 49 - H K Rathod - Full Document
1