Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.62 seconds)
Ajabrao Girmaji Bhagat And 5 Others vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Mangrulpir Ps ... on 11 April, 2023 cites

Sanaullah Khan Ahamad Khan And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. ... on 18 June, 2019

(9) Learned counsel for the applicants relied on the decisions of this Court in cases of Sainuddin Khan s/o Sanaullah Khan and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr., in Criminal Application (APL) No.465/2016, decided on 05.04.2018 and Smt. Vrushali Jayesh Kore Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr., in Criminal Application No.1122/2021, decided on 07.01.2023 as well as decision of Supreme Court in case of Kahkashan Kausar Alias Sonam and Ors. Vs. State of Bihar and Ors, (2022) 6 SCC 599 . There can be no dispute that if on facts the Court comes to the conclusion that the allegations are vague, actuated with malafides, then the prosecution cannot be allowed to be continued. However, there is no ratio as such to apply as each case differs on facts.
Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam vs The State Of Bihar on 8 February, 2022

(9) Learned counsel for the applicants relied on the decisions of this Court in cases of Sainuddin Khan s/o Sanaullah Khan and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr., in Criminal Application (APL) No.465/2016, decided on 05.04.2018 and Smt. Vrushali Jayesh Kore Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr., in Criminal Application No.1122/2021, decided on 07.01.2023 as well as decision of Supreme Court in case of Kahkashan Kausar Alias Sonam and Ors. Vs. State of Bihar and Ors, (2022) 6 SCC 599 . There can be no dispute that if on facts the Court comes to the conclusion that the allegations are vague, actuated with malafides, then the prosecution cannot be allowed to be continued. However, there is no ratio as such to apply as each case differs on facts.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 535 - K Murari - Full Document

Vrushali Jayesh Kore vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another on 24 February, 2022

(9) Learned counsel for the applicants relied on the decisions of this Court in cases of Sainuddin Khan s/o Sanaullah Khan and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr., in Criminal Application (APL) No.465/2016, decided on 05.04.2018 and Smt. Vrushali Jayesh Kore Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr., in Criminal Application No.1122/2021, decided on 07.01.2023 as well as decision of Supreme Court in case of Kahkashan Kausar Alias Sonam and Ors. Vs. State of Bihar and Ors, (2022) 6 SCC 599 . There can be no dispute that if on facts the Court comes to the conclusion that the allegations are vague, actuated with malafides, then the prosecution cannot be allowed to be continued. However, there is no ratio as such to apply as each case differs on facts.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - V K Jadhav - Full Document
1