Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.52 seconds)The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
Section 94 in The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 [Entire Act]
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
Section 35 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 [Entire Act]
State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) vs Shailesh Kumar on 29 April, 2019
16. Further, in a judgement by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in State
vs. Shailesh Kumar (2019) SCC Online Del 8318, wherein the Court
following the decision of Jarnail Singh vs. State of Haryana (2013) 7 SCC
263, the Court held that no probative value can be attached to a record unless
and until the parents or guardians are examined or the person on whose
information the entry may have been made, is examined. The relevant portion
of the said decision reads as follows:
Jarnail Singh vs State Of Haryana on 1 July, 2013
16. Further, in a judgement by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in State
vs. Shailesh Kumar (2019) SCC Online Del 8318, wherein the Court
following the decision of Jarnail Singh vs. State of Haryana (2013) 7 SCC
263, the Court held that no probative value can be attached to a record unless
and until the parents or guardians are examined or the person on whose
information the entry may have been made, is examined. The relevant portion
of the said decision reads as follows:
Brij Mohan Singh vs Priya Brat Narain Sinha And Ors on 5 February, 1964
In the case of
Brij Mohan Singh v. Priya Brat Narain Sinha reported
as AIR 1965 SC 282, the Supreme Court held that an
entry of birth recorded in the school register
maintained by an illiterate Chowkidar, was not
admissible and had no probative value within the
meaning of Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act.
...
Md. Jabbar Ali vs The State Of Assam on 17 October, 2022
26. At this stage, it would be apposite to refer to a judgement of a
coordinate Bench of this Court in (Jabbar vs. State 2018:DHC:3596-DB),
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(CRL) 3426/2024 Page 12 of 19
Digitally Signed
By:DHIRENDER KUMAR
Signing Date:15.11.2024
17:12:36
wherein the ld. division Bench was dealing with an appeal from the Appellant
therein who was convicted under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from
Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter 'POCSO Act'), had to deal with a
similar issue determining the age of the survivor, wherein, the Court observed
and held as under: