Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.35 seconds)
Sunil Kumar vs M/O Defence on 10 January, 2019 cites

Union Of India And Anr vs Chotelal And Ors on 8 December, 1998

7. Prior thereto, in the case of UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS V. CHOTELAL AND OTHERS, JT 1998 (8) SC 497, relating to Dhobis appointed to wash the clothes of cadets at the National Defence Academy, Kharakwasla, question arose whether the Dhobis were holders of civil post or not. Reversing the decision of the Tribunal that it had jurisdiction to entertain the original application, the Hon‟ble Supreme Court held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 70 - S V Manohar - Full Document

Court In The Case Of Secretary, State Of ... vs . Uma on 9 April, 2015

2. The applicants have filed this OA under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, for quashing the letter dated 7.4.2017 (Annexure A-1) vide which their claim for grant of equal pay for equal work, and regularization of their services, against regular Group D posts in the respondent department, has been rejected and for issuance of a direction to the respondents to regularize their service from the initial date of their appointment as per the Scheme dated 16.8.2012 (Annexure A-2), circulating therewith Government of India, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi, O.M. dated 26.3.2012, based upon decision of Hon‟ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Civil Appeal No. 3595-3612/1999 titled SECRETARY, STATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS VS. UMA DEVI & OTHERS, decided on 10.4.2016, as according to the applicants, they were appointed through proper selection process against vacant posts and having rendered requisite years of service, and as such, are entitled for regularization as well as well as equal pay for equal work.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 2142 - Full Document

Antony Xavier D'Cruz vs Union Of India on 20 June, 2007

6. The solitary indicated issue has already been set rest by the coordinate benches of this Tribunal. The Ernakulam Bench of this Tribunal in O.A. No. 726 of 2008 titled XAVIER ANTONY & OTHERS VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS decided on 10.12.2009 has delved over the issue in detail and held that the persons, who are paid remuneration from regimental funds, are not entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. The observation made by the Division Bench of the Tribunal are reproduced in toto, as under :-
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 14 - P C Kuriakose - Full Document
1