Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)
Y S Chowdary vs Bureau Of Immigration on 11 September, 2023 cites

Sumit Mehta vs State Of N.C.T. Of Delhi on 13 September, 2013

10. Taking into consideration the fact that the case registered against the petitioner pertains to the year 2016 and the fact that till as on date no charge sheet has been filed and the petitioner has not been arrayed as accused in FIR even as on today, and the law laid down by the Apex Court in various judgments (1) Satwant Singh Sawhney v D.Ramarathnam reported in 1967 (2) SCR 521 para 21 (2) Menaka Gandhi v Union of India reported in 1978 (1) SCC 248 para 193, (3) Judgment dated 09.04.2019, in Satish Chandra Verma v Union of India (UOI) reported in (2019) SCC on line SC 2048 Para 5, (4) Judgment of the Apex Court in a judgment reported in 2013 (15) SCC page 570 in Sumit Mehta v State of NCT of Delhi, para 13 and (5) The Judgment of Division Bench of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Noor Paul Vs. Union of India 6 WP_24657_2023 SN,J reported in 2022 SCC online P & H 1176, and in view of the same, this Court is inclined to grant permission to the petitioner to travel abroad from 17.09.2023 to 19.01.2024.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 1375 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

A.N. Jegannathan (Deceased), ... vs The Union Of India (Uoi), Represented By ... on 3 June, 2002

10. Taking into consideration the fact that the case registered against the petitioner pertains to the year 2016 and the fact that till as on date no charge sheet has been filed and the petitioner has not been arrayed as accused in FIR even as on today, and the law laid down by the Apex Court in various judgments (1) Satwant Singh Sawhney v D.Ramarathnam reported in 1967 (2) SCR 521 para 21 (2) Menaka Gandhi v Union of India reported in 1978 (1) SCC 248 para 193, (3) Judgment dated 09.04.2019, in Satish Chandra Verma v Union of India (UOI) reported in (2019) SCC on line SC 2048 Para 5, (4) Judgment of the Apex Court in a judgment reported in 2013 (15) SCC page 570 in Sumit Mehta v State of NCT of Delhi, para 13 and (5) The Judgment of Division Bench of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Noor Paul Vs. Union of India 6 WP_24657_2023 SN,J reported in 2022 SCC online P & H 1176, and in view of the same, this Court is inclined to grant permission to the petitioner to travel abroad from 17.09.2023 to 19.01.2024.
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 74 - A K Rajan - Full Document

Noor Paul vs Union Of India And Ors on 5 April, 2022

10. Taking into consideration the fact that the case registered against the petitioner pertains to the year 2016 and the fact that till as on date no charge sheet has been filed and the petitioner has not been arrayed as accused in FIR even as on today, and the law laid down by the Apex Court in various judgments (1) Satwant Singh Sawhney v D.Ramarathnam reported in 1967 (2) SCR 521 para 21 (2) Menaka Gandhi v Union of India reported in 1978 (1) SCC 248 para 193, (3) Judgment dated 09.04.2019, in Satish Chandra Verma v Union of India (UOI) reported in (2019) SCC on line SC 2048 Para 5, (4) Judgment of the Apex Court in a judgment reported in 2013 (15) SCC page 570 in Sumit Mehta v State of NCT of Delhi, para 13 and (5) The Judgment of Division Bench of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Noor Paul Vs. Union of India 6 WP_24657_2023 SN,J reported in 2022 SCC online P & H 1176, and in view of the same, this Court is inclined to grant permission to the petitioner to travel abroad from 17.09.2023 to 19.01.2024.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 25 - M S Rao - Full Document

Satwant Singh Sawhney vs D. Ramarathnam, Assistant Passport ... on 10 April, 1967

10. Taking into consideration the fact that the case registered against the petitioner pertains to the year 2016 and the fact that till as on date no charge sheet has been filed and the petitioner has not been arrayed as accused in FIR even as on today, and the law laid down by the Apex Court in various judgments (1) Satwant Singh Sawhney v D.Ramarathnam reported in 1967 (2) SCR 521 para 21 (2) Menaka Gandhi v Union of India reported in 1978 (1) SCC 248 para 193, (3) Judgment dated 09.04.2019, in Satish Chandra Verma v Union of India (UOI) reported in (2019) SCC on line SC 2048 Para 5, (4) Judgment of the Apex Court in a judgment reported in 2013 (15) SCC page 570 in Sumit Mehta v State of NCT of Delhi, para 13 and (5) The Judgment of Division Bench of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Noor Paul Vs. Union of India 6 WP_24657_2023 SN,J reported in 2022 SCC online P & H 1176, and in view of the same, this Court is inclined to grant permission to the petitioner to travel abroad from 17.09.2023 to 19.01.2024.
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 188 - K S Rao - Full Document

Satish Chandra Anand vs The Union Of India (Uoi) on 13 March, 1953

10. Taking into consideration the fact that the case registered against the petitioner pertains to the year 2016 and the fact that till as on date no charge sheet has been filed and the petitioner has not been arrayed as accused in FIR even as on today, and the law laid down by the Apex Court in various judgments (1) Satwant Singh Sawhney v D.Ramarathnam reported in 1967 (2) SCR 521 para 21 (2) Menaka Gandhi v Union of India reported in 1978 (1) SCC 248 para 193, (3) Judgment dated 09.04.2019, in Satish Chandra Verma v Union of India (UOI) reported in (2019) SCC on line SC 2048 Para 5, (4) Judgment of the Apex Court in a judgment reported in 2013 (15) SCC page 570 in Sumit Mehta v State of NCT of Delhi, para 13 and (5) The Judgment of Division Bench of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Noor Paul Vs. Union of India 6 WP_24657_2023 SN,J reported in 2022 SCC online P & H 1176, and in view of the same, this Court is inclined to grant permission to the petitioner to travel abroad from 17.09.2023 to 19.01.2024.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1