Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (1.98 seconds)Article 312 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The All India Services Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Union Of India & Anr vs Samar Singh & Ors on 8 October, 1996
In view of the express provisions of para 14 of the Central
Staffing Scheme, read in the light of the judgment of his Court in Samar
Singh (supra), the appointment of State cadre IAS officers for the post of
Additional Secretary/Secretary to the Government of India does not amount
to promotion.
Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke And Ors. vs Dr. B.S. Mahajan And Ors. on 6 December, 1989
After
referring to para 14 of the Central Staffing Scheme and the observations as
to the limited nature of review for selection for appointment indicated in
Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke v. Dr. B.S. Mahajan7; Jai Narain Misra (Dr) v.
State of Bihar8 and Major General I.P.S. Dewan v. Union of India9, this
Court observed in para 11 as under:
Jai Narain Mishra And Ors. vs State Of Bihar on 3 November, 1971
After
referring to para 14 of the Central Staffing Scheme and the observations as
to the limited nature of review for selection for appointment indicated in
Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke v. Dr. B.S. Mahajan7; Jai Narain Misra (Dr) v.
State of Bihar8 and Major General I.P.S. Dewan v. Union of India9, this
Court observed in para 11 as under:
Major General I.P.S. Dewan vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 7 March, 1995
After
referring to para 14 of the Central Staffing Scheme and the observations as
to the limited nature of review for selection for appointment indicated in
Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke v. Dr. B.S. Mahajan7; Jai Narain Misra (Dr) v.
State of Bihar8 and Major General I.P.S. Dewan v. Union of India9, this
Court observed in para 11 as under:
Article 154 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Shri A.B.Krishna & Ors vs The State Of Karnataka & Ors on 14 January, 1998
I. Constitutional validity of the Central Staffing Scheme
The appellant strongly urged that his case falls under the procedure
prescribed in the Central Staffing Scheme, which is wholly unconstitutional
and illegal. According to the appellant, the service conditions of IAS
officers are governed by the provisions of the All India Services Act, 1951
(AIS Act) and the Rules framed thereunder. The appellant contended that it
was not permissible for the Government of India to prescribe any procedure
therefor other than by way of rules framed strictly in accordance with the
AIS Act. In his submission, no executive order made in respect of a matter
under Article 309 or 312 could be inconsistent with the statutory rules
framed under the AIS Act. The Central Staffing Scheme was neither the
provisions of any legislative enactment nor a supporting legislation framed
under the AIS Act, and, therefore, to the extent of inconsistency with the
said Act or the Rules framed thereunder, it was illegal. For this
contention, the appellant relied on the judgment of this Court in G.K. Rao
and Others v. S. Bhattacharya1 and A.B. Krishna v. State of Karnataka2.