Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 40 (0.31 seconds)

Surya Dev Rai vs Ram Chander Rai & Ors on 7 August, 2003

14. This Court has got wide power to exercise jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India even if an alternative remedy is available to the petitioner, in case no interference will cause to serious miscarriage of justice or the authority or trial Court had exercise jurisdiction which was not vested in it, Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai and Ors. (supra). The argument advanced by Mr. Prashant Chandra relating to the entertainment of writ petition vis-a-vis availability of alternative remedy is a settled proposition of law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 3621 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Dipak Chandra Ruhidas vs Chandan Kumar Sarkar on 31 July, 2003

19. Since, by the impugned order the Debt Recovery Tribunal had granted permission to settle the dispute or compromise in view of RBI guidelines which has got direct nexus with the pending controversy before the appellate authority, it shall not be proper to interfere with the impugned order under the writ jurisdiction. The substantial illegality, infirmity or binding nature of other judgment of the Tribunal under similar circumstance can very well be considered by appellate authority by entertaining the appeal under Section 20 of the Act. The Apex Court in a case Dipak Chandra Ruhidas v. Chandan Kumar Sarkar (supra), held that the power of appellate Court is much wider than power conferred to High Court or Supreme Court. The appellate authority has got wide power to go into, interfere and decide the controversy in question.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 45 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next