Vijay Kumar Tiwari vs State Of M.P. And Ors. on 9 December, 2005
Per contra, Shri Purushaindra Kaurav, learned Sr. counsel for the IDA
contends as a matter of fact, preceding the impugned resolution, the
allotment was cancelled long back. The IDA in fact has acted in accordance
with the directives issued by the High Court in series of orders in different
petitions from time to time starting from the order dated 09.12.2005 passed
in M.P. No. 3518/1992(Vijay Kumar Tiwari Vs. State of M.P.) uptil October,
2020 in W.P. No. 11616/2020 pursuant whereto a committee was constituted
to conduct survey. Petitioner was called to submit reply and upon due
consideration, it was found that petitioner purportedly did not carry out any
activity on land and, therefore, the very purpose for which the petitioner
continued to be in possession was found to be non-existent. The committee
so constituted therefore upon due inspection has made recommendations
inter-alia, possibilities of compounding lapses, irregularities by the allottees,
dispossession, recourse to fresh allotment etc.. As the recommendation of
the committee is against the petitioner, therefore, the plot in question is liable
3 WP-18474-2020
for auction.