Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.50 seconds)Section 11A in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Anil Kumar vs Presiding Officer And Ors. on 8 May, 1985
In support of the aforesaid submissions, reliance was placed
on the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Anil Kumar v.
Presiding Officer and Others, (1985) 3 SCC 378; Kranti Associates
Private Limited and Another v. Masood Ahmed Khan and Others,
(2010) 9 SCC 496; Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank and
Others, (2009) 2 SCC 570; and M/s. Glaxo Laboratories (I) Ltd. v.
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Meerut and Others, (1984) 1 SCC
M/S Kranti Asso. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs Masood Ahmed Khan & Ors on 8 September, 2010
In support of the aforesaid submissions, reliance was placed
on the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Anil Kumar v.
Presiding Officer and Others, (1985) 3 SCC 378; Kranti Associates
Private Limited and Another v. Masood Ahmed Khan and Others,
(2010) 9 SCC 496; Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank and
Others, (2009) 2 SCC 570; and M/s. Glaxo Laboratories (I) Ltd. v.
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Meerut and Others, (1984) 1 SCC
Roop Singh Negi vs Punjab National Bank & Ors on 19 December, 2008
In support of the aforesaid submissions, reliance was placed
on the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Anil Kumar v.
Presiding Officer and Others, (1985) 3 SCC 378; Kranti Associates
Private Limited and Another v. Masood Ahmed Khan and Others,
(2010) 9 SCC 496; Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank and
Others, (2009) 2 SCC 570; and M/s. Glaxo Laboratories (I) Ltd. v.
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Meerut and Others, (1984) 1 SCC
Glaxo Laboratories vs The Presiding Officer, Labour Court ... on 6 October, 1983
In support of the aforesaid submissions, reliance was placed
on the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Anil Kumar v.
Presiding Officer and Others, (1985) 3 SCC 378; Kranti Associates
Private Limited and Another v. Masood Ahmed Khan and Others,
(2010) 9 SCC 496; Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank and
Others, (2009) 2 SCC 570; and M/s. Glaxo Laboratories (I) Ltd. v.
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Meerut and Others, (1984) 1 SCC
Tata Engineering And Locomotive ... vs N.K. Singh on 8 November, 2006
In
support of the aforesaid submissions, reliance was placed on the
judgments in Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. N.K.
Singh, 2007 (1) CLR 193; R. Madaswamy and Another v. Indian
Express Newspaper, 2014 (5) Bom.C.R. 342; and Bajaj Auto
Limited v. Kalidas Devram Patil, 1999 (3) Mh.L.J. 857.
Bajaj Auto Limited vs Kalidas Devram Patil on 21 September, 1999
In
support of the aforesaid submissions, reliance was placed on the
judgments in Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. N.K.
Singh, 2007 (1) CLR 193; R. Madaswamy and Another v. Indian
Express Newspaper, 2014 (5) Bom.C.R. 342; and Bajaj Auto
Limited v. Kalidas Devram Patil, 1999 (3) Mh.L.J. 857.
Deepali Gundu Surwase vs Kranti Junior Adhyapak & Ors on 12 August, 2013
38. On the point of grant of 50% back wages, it becomes
necessary to examine the relief in the light of the principles laid
down by the Supreme Court in Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti
Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya,(2013) 10 SCC 324. The said
17
::: Uploaded on - 27/02/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 27/02/2026 22:40:54 :::
wp-11337-2023 with connected-J.doc
judgment authoritatively clarifies that in cases of wrongful
termination, reinstatement with continuity of service and full back
wages is the normal rule. Departure from this rule is permissible
only where the facts of the case justify reduction, and such
departure must rest on clear reasons supported by material on
record.
1