Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (1.30 seconds)
Hector Hoshang Mehta And Ors. vs Marol Nand Dham Udyog Premises Co-Op. ... on 19 October, 2001
cites
The Factories Act, 1948
Section 106 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 114A in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947
Section 5 in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960
The Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976
Osman Fakir Mohammed Divecha vs All Akbar Javed Sadakya & Anr on 28 August, 1969
In Osman Fakir Mahomed Divecha v. Ali Akbar Javed Sadakya & another, , it was held that where a lease of open land situated in the Bombay Suburban District was made for constructing "buildings of every description howsoever" from time to time, the purpose for which the land was demised clearly was for constructing buildings of any description and not for constructing buildings for residence, education, business, trade or storage. It was, therefore, held that the land demised, though "premises" within the meaning of section 5(8), was not "premises within the meaning of section 6(1) of the Rent Act.