Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.32 seconds)

Avtar Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 July, 2016

15. On perusal of the impugned order dated 17.04.2023, it can be very well seen that the respondent authorities have granted reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, passed a reasoned and speaking order following directions contained in Avatar Singh (supra) case and also gave reasons for not reinstating the petitioner and have rejected the prayer for imposition of lesser penalty other than termination/ dismissal/removal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 1443 - A Mishra - Full Document

Hikmat Ali Khan vs Ishwar Prasad Arya & Ors on 28 January, 1997

In Hikmat Ali Khan (supra) and Raghvendra Kumar (supra), the Apex Court has already held that conviction under Section 307 of IPC would amount to moral turpitude. It is for the employer to appoint or not to appoint a person who had committed an offence which falls within the definition of moral turpitude. To support his contention, learned counsel for the respondents has relied upon various judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 9 - S C Agrawal - Full Document

Raghvendra Kumar vs Prabal Kumar & Ors on 16 September, 2013

In Hikmat Ali Khan (supra) and Raghvendra Kumar (supra), the Apex Court has already held that conviction under Section 307 of IPC would amount to moral turpitude. It is for the employer to appoint or not to appoint a person who had committed an offence which falls within the definition of moral turpitude. To support his contention, learned counsel for the respondents has relied upon various judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1