Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (1.57 seconds)Section 17 in The Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies Act, 1983 [Entire Act]
P.V. Mahadevan vs M.D. Tamil Nadu Housing Board on 8 August, 2005
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 15 of 20
W.P.No.29014 of 2010
4.6.As already stated, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the there was a huge delay in initiation and completion of departmental
proceedings. It is pertinent to refer to the relevant portion of the judgment of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Appeal (Civil).No.4901 of 2005 in the case of
P.V.Mahadevan Vs. M.D.Tamil Nadu Housing Board for better appreciation.
B.Maximus vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 April, 2022
The very same ground has been specifically raised in
this appeal before this Court wherein it is stated that the
delay of more than 10 years in initiating the disciplinary
proceedings by issuance of charge memo would render the
departmental proceedings vitiated and that in the absence of
any explanation for the inordinate delay in initiating such
proceedings of issuance of charge memo would justify the
prayer for quashing the proceedings as made in the writ
petition.''
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 16 of 20
W.P.No.29014 of 2010
4.7.The relevant portion of the order in W.P.No.34197 of 2016 in the
case of B.Maximus Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu & ors is extracted herein
under,
“10. The Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Court in
numerous decisions have held that inordinate delay in
initiation or completion of disciplinary proceedings by itself
would cause grave prejudice to the rights of the government
employees and interfered with disciplinary proceedings on
that ground alone. In this case, to say that there was
inordinate delay in completion of the departmental action is
an understatement. .”
Section 87 in The Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies Act, 1983 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Meghalaya Co-operative Societies Act
1