Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.60 seconds)
K.Surendran Aged 62 Years vs Election Commission Of India on 28 March, 2014 cites

Manoj Dubey vs Election Commission Of India And Ors. on 11 February, 2002

That in the case Manoj Dubey v. Election Commission of India reported in AIR 2002 Allahabad 167, the Allahabad High Court interfered with the order of the Election Commission prescribing alternate mode of identification of electors other than EPIC and that the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No.3820-3821 of 2002 in the case Election Commission of India v. Manoj Dubey and others stayed the above said judgment of the Allahabad High Court by order dated 4.3.2002 and observed that EPIC and other alternate identity w.p.c.10503/14 - : 16 :-
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 4 - S R Alam - Full Document

N.P. Ponnuswami vs Returning Officer, Namakkal ... on 21 January, 1952

the Apex Court as in the case in N.P.Ponnuswami v. the Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency reported in AIR 1952 SC 64 and in a long line of case laws rendered thereafter as in the cases as in Shyamdeo Pd. Singh v. Nawal Kishore Yadav reported in (2000) 8 SCC 46 and other rulings that the underlying the plenary bar on judicial proceedings in election matters created by Article 329(b) of the Constitution of India is pre-emptory urgency of prompt engineering of the whole election process without intermediate interruptions by way of legal proceedings challenging the steps and stages in between its commencement and the conclusion. It is further submitted that Ext.P1 circular dated 28.3.2014 issued by the 2nd respondent-Chief Electoral Officer, Kerala, is only based on Annexure A order dated 2.4.2014 issued by the 1st respondent- Election Commission of India. Annexure B is the letter dated 2.4.2014 issued by the 1st respondent Election Commission of India addressed to the Chief Electoral Officers of all States and Union territories and Annexure C is the letter issued by the 1st respondent-Election Commission of India addressed to the Chief Electoral Officers of all States and Union Territories dealing with the w.p.c.10503/14 - : 6 :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 830 - Full Document

Shyamdeo Pd. Singh vs Nawal Kishore Yadav on 28 August, 2000

the Apex Court as in the case in N.P.Ponnuswami v. the Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency reported in AIR 1952 SC 64 and in a long line of case laws rendered thereafter as in the cases as in Shyamdeo Pd. Singh v. Nawal Kishore Yadav reported in (2000) 8 SCC 46 and other rulings that the underlying the plenary bar on judicial proceedings in election matters created by Article 329(b) of the Constitution of India is pre-emptory urgency of prompt engineering of the whole election process without intermediate interruptions by way of legal proceedings challenging the steps and stages in between its commencement and the conclusion. It is further submitted that Ext.P1 circular dated 28.3.2014 issued by the 2nd respondent-Chief Electoral Officer, Kerala, is only based on Annexure A order dated 2.4.2014 issued by the 1st respondent- Election Commission of India. Annexure B is the letter dated 2.4.2014 issued by the 1st respondent Election Commission of India addressed to the Chief Electoral Officers of all States and Union territories and Annexure C is the letter issued by the 1st respondent-Election Commission of India addressed to the Chief Electoral Officers of all States and Union Territories dealing with the w.p.c.10503/14 - : 6 :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 50 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

P. Gajapathi vs Election Commission Of India on 2 April, 2001

In Annexure D produced in the statement filed by the 1st respondent, reference is made to the Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court in P.Gajapathi v. Election Commission of India, reported in AIR 2001 Madras 446, wherein it has been held that since the Government could not issue EPIC to all voters, such voters have to satisfy their identity by production of alternate documents specified and insisted by the Election Commission.
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Ram Deo Bhandari vs Election Commission Of India on 17 January, 1995

documents as notified by the Election Commission would come into operation and could be given effect to in the election. It is also pointed out that in Ram Deo Bhandari and others v. Election Commission of India in Writ Petition (Civil) No.2/1995, the issue regarding insistence of EPIC came up for consideration before the Apex Court and in that case, the Election Commission of India submitted that in places where the exercise of issuance of photo identity cards is not complete, the Election Commission of India proposes to continue the practice of prescribing alternate documents for identification of voters at the time of polling and based on the affidavit filed by the Election Commission of India, the above said Writ Petition (Civil) No.2/1995 was closed by the Supreme Court as per the order dated 17.8.2000. It is pointed out by the respondents that the impugned action to permit the alternative photo identity documents including the impugned authenticated photo voter slip has been issued in exercise of the plenary powers of the Election Commission of India conferred under Article 324 of the Constitution of India and that it is done essentially to effectuate the right to vote conferred as per Section 62 of the w.p.c.10503/14 - : 17 :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 3 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1