Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)Section 7 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Santosh Kumar Datta vs Chairman, Sapatgram Small Town ... on 6 August, 1974
The Bench agreed with the decision of Gauhati High Court in Santosh Kumar Dutta's case (supra) and overruled the single Judge decision of this Court in Ajodhiya Prasad v. State (supra). That Bench decision was perhaps not brought to the notice of the learned Judge who has made this reference,
Ajodhia Prasad vs State Through Ram Rakhu on 10 July, 1950
The Bench agreed with the decision of Gauhati High Court in Santosh Kumar Dutta's case (supra) and overruled the single Judge decision of this Court in Ajodhiya Prasad v. State (supra). That Bench decision was perhaps not brought to the notice of the learned Judge who has made this reference,
Om Prakash Gupta vs State Of U. P.(With Connected Appeals) on 11 January, 1957
1. While hearing arguments in Criminal Revision No, 280 of 1980 (Om Prakash v. State) a learned single Judge of this Court was faced with the problem whether or not the presence of Tisi oil in the ratio of less than 7% in a sample of mustard oil purchased from a vendor by the Food Inspector, would make the mustard oil "adulterated" so as to attract the provisions of Sections 7 and 16 Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. He has, therefore, referred the following question for decision by a larger Bench:
Badri Prasad vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Another on 16 March, 1965
Citing this decision with approval the Division Bench of this Court laid down in Badri Prasad's case (1979 Cri LJ 1095) (supra) that (para 12):
1