Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 41 (1.04 seconds)Section 460 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 457 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 396 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Matadin vs State Of Maharashtra on 4 August, 1998
xvi) It is further submitted that, even if, the presence of the
Appellant is presumed at the crime spot, the same does not reflect
intention on the part of the Appellant to cause the death of the mother
of the PW-1. It is the case of the Appellant that the present is not the
case where the deceased was repeatedly stabbed with a knife and a
single blow injury is not sufficient, in view of the facts of the present
case, to show that the Appellant had intended to cause the death of the
mother of PW1. Thus, the present case would not come within the
purview of Section 302 of the IPC. Reliance has been placed on
Matadin v. State of Maharashtra5 to support this contention.
O.M Cherian @ Thankachan vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 11 November, 2014
Collector of Customs18;
n) O.M. Cherian v. State of Kerala19;
o) Duryodhan Rout v. State of Orissa20;
p) Matadin v. State of Maharashtra21.
6
2016 SCC OnLine HP 738
7
1997 SCC OnLine P & H 329
8
SCC OnLine Del 279
9
MANU/DE/1776/2017
10
2023 SCC OnLine SC 1061
11
1986 SCC OnLine Del 4
12
1989 SCC OnLine Del 373
13
2023 SCC OnLine SC 933
14
(1979) 3 SCC 319
15
(2010) 6 SCC 1
16
AIR 1936 PC 253
17
2023/DHC/000036
18
(1988) 4 SCC 183
19
(2015) 2 SCC 501
20
(2015) 2 SCC 783
21
(1998) 7 SCC 216
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SHIWANI NEGI CRL.A. 826/2018 and connected matters Page 17 of 61
Signing Date:06.02.2025
05:19:06
4.2 Arguments advanced on behalf of Appellant, Tinku, are as
follows: -
i) Learned Counsel for Tinku has submitted that the recovery of