Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.26 seconds)The Delhi Prevention Of Defacement Of Property Act, 2007
Section 3 in The Delhi Prevention Of Defacement Of Property Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Hdfc Bank Ltd vs J.J.Mannan @ J.M.John Paul & Anr on 16 December, 2009
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 21:45:11
HDFC Bank Ltd. v. State & Anr4, where proceedings under the DPDP Act
were quashed on the ground that no allegation of writing or marking upon
the property itself had been made.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 2 in The Delhi Prevention Of Defacement Of Property Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Hiralal D. Karnavt @ ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 December, 2019
5. In the present case, there is admittedly, no allegation, either in the
FIR, the chargesheet, or the statement recorded under Section 161 of CrPC,
that the Petitioner wrote or marked upon the electricity pole with any
material such as ink, chalk, paint or any other material. The gravamen of the
accusation is limited to the affixation of a banner/poster, which, as per the
law laid down in T.S. Marwah (Supra), and followed in HDFC Bank
(supra), does not contravene Section 3(1) of the DPDP Act.
1