Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 17 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 58 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma & Ors on 15 May, 2018
12. Per contra, the learned counsel for the first respondent,
Mrs. D.Sathya, would submit that, even in the sale deed in which the
appellant purchased the property, it is totally silent as to title of the suit
property. She would state that there was no mention of any oral partition in
8/15
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.163 of 2018
Exhibit A2 sale deed, under which the appellant purchased the suit property.
She would also refer to the Advocate Commissioner’s report and state that
subsequent to partition in the year 1940, there has been no partition in the
family and placed reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in
the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma and others reported in 2020
9 SCC 1, where the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that evidentiary value of
an oral partition is weak and the same ought to be proved by strong
evidence.
1