Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.87 seconds)Section 3 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Sneh Gupta vs Devi Sarup & Ors on 17 February, 2009
In the case of Sneh Gupta v. Devi Sarup, (2009) 6 SCC 194,
in paragraph 70, the Apex Court has held that in absence of any
application for condonation of delay, the Court has no jurisdiction
in terms of S. 3, Limitation Act, 1963 to entertain the application
filed for setting aside of decree after expiry of period of
limitation.
Article 119 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 4 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 39 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag & ... vs Mst. Katiji & Ors on 19 February, 1987
"3. No doubt, some leeway is given for the Government
inefficiencies but the sad part is that the authorities keep on
relying on judicial pronouncements for a period of time when
technology had not advanced and a greater leeway was given to
the Government (Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag & Anr vs.
Mst. Katiji & Ors. (1987) 2 SCC 107).This position is more than
elucidated by the judgment of this Court in Office of the Chief
Post Master General & Ors.v. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr.
(2012) 3 SCC 563 where the Court observed as under: