Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Office Of The Chief Post Master & Ors vs Living Media India Ltd.& Anr on 24 February, 2012
"3. No doubt, some leeway is given for the
Government inefficiencies but the sad part is that the
authorities keep on relying on judicial pronouncements
for a period of time when technology had not advanced
and a greater leeway was given to the Government
[LAOv.Katiji]. This position is more than elucidated
by the judgment of this Court in Post Master General
v. Living Media India Ltd. (2012) 3 SCC 563 where
the Court observed as under:-
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Perumon Bhagvathy Devaswom Perinadu ... vs Bhargavi Amma (D) Thr. Lrs on 11 July, 2008
16. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Perumon Bhagvathy Devaswam vs.
Bhargavi Amma, 2008 (8) SCC 321, at para 13 (iii) enunciated
besides others the following principle qua an application under
Section 5 of the Limitation Act:
P.K. Ramachandran vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 19 September, 1997
17. A reference to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in
AIR 1998 SC 2276, titled as P. K. Ramachadran v. State of Kerala
would also be appropriate and advantageous, wherein at para 6
following is noticed.
1