Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.41 seconds)

K.T.M.S. Mohd. And Anr vs Union Of India on 28 April, 1992

"6. The mere fact that a person has made a contradictory statement in a judicial proceeding is not by itself always sufficient to justify a prosecution under Sections 199 and 200 of the Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860) (hereinafter referred to as "the I.P.C."); but it must be shown that the defendant has intentionally given a false statement at any stage of the judicial proceedings or fabricated false evidence for the purpose of using the same at any stage of the judicial proceedings. Even after the above position has emerged also, still the court has to form an opinion that it is expedient in the interests of justice to initiate an inquiry into the offences of false evidence and offences against Page No.13 public justice and more specifically referred to in Section 340 (1) of the Cr.P.C., having regard to the overall factual matrix as well as the probable consequences of such a prosecution. (See K.T.M.S. Mohd. and Another Vs. Union of India). The court must be satisfied that such an inquiry is required in the interests of justice and appropriate in the facts of the case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 39 - Cited by 194 - S R Pandian - Full Document
1   2 Next