Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.43 seconds)Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Anjali Ashok Sadhwani vs Ashok Kishinchand Sadhwani on 5 December, 2008
In the case of Anjali Ashok Sadhwani Vs. Ashok
Kishinchand Sadhwani, AIR 2009 SC 1374, the
transfer petition filed by the wife was allowed
considering the distance between two places and the fact
that wife has no one in family to escort her.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Smt. Kalpana Deviprakash Thakar vs Dr. Deviprakash Thakar on 4 November, 1996
In the case of Smt. Kalpana Deviprakash Thakar Vs.
Dr. Deviprakash Thakar, 1996 (11) SCC 96, the
Supreme Court dismissed the transfer petition filed by
the wife considering the fact that being a medical
practitioner, patients of the husband would suffer and
Palanpur, where the wife is residing, is connected by
train with Bombay, where she has come near relations,
and she will not face any much difficulty in undertaking
the journey.
Anita Laxmi Narayan Singh vs Laxmi Narain Singh on 24 March, 1992
In the case of Anita Laxmi Narayan Singh Vs. Laxmi
Narain Singh, 1992(2) SCC 562, the Supreme Court
allowed the transfer petition on the ground that the
husband is a high ranking railway officer who would be
entitled to travel facilities.
Shiv Kumari Devanndra Ojha vs Ramajor Shitla Prasad Ojha & Ors on 13 January, 1997
In the case of Shiv Kumari Devendra Ojha Vs.
Ramajor Shitla Prasad Ojha and others, AIR 1997
Supreme Court 1036, the Supreme Court dismissed the
transfer application filed by wife on the ground that
husband agreeing to bear expenditure of travel and stay
of wife whenever she attends Court. The application was
also dismissed on the ground that the plea taken by the
wife that no advocate was available at place where case
was pending, is not tenable.
Kulwinder Kaur @ Kulwinder Gurcharan ... vs Kandi Friends Education Trust And ... on 11 January, 2008
In the case of Kulwinder Kaur alias Kulwinder Vs.
Kandi Friends Education trust and others, 2008(3)
SCC 659, the Supreme Court while remanding the case
VINOD KUMAR
2014.11.05 14:29
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh
TA No.174 of 2013 (O&M) [ 14 ]
*****
back to high Court observed that if the Court feels that
the plaintiff or the defendant is not likely to have a 'fair
trail' in the Court from which he seeks to transfer a case,
it is not only the power, but the duty of the Court to
transfer the case.
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Fatema vs Jafri Syed Husain (Parvez) on 3 December, 2008
In the case of Fatema v. Jafri Syed Husain(Parvez.),
AIR 2009 Supreme Court 1773, the Supreme Court
transferred the matrimonial proceedings from the Family
Court at Aurangabad to the Civil Court at Srinagar,
VINOD KUMAR
2014.11.05 14:29
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh
TA No.174 of 2013 (O&M) [6]
*****
Jammu and Kashmir considering the fact that the wife
was only 22 years of age and, therefore, it would be
difficult for her to attend the Court proceedings at
Aurangabad from Srinagar.