Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.36 seconds)
Harla vs The State Of Rajasthan on 24 September, 1951 cites

Moosa Haji Abdul Shakoor vs Emperor on 30 November, 1932

promulgation can have been known." So also it has been applied in India in, for instance, matters arising under Rule 119 of the Defence of India Rules. See, for example, Crown v. Manghumal Tekuml(1), Shakoor v. King Emperor (2) and Babulal v. King Emperor (3). It is true none of these cases is analogous to the one before us but they are only particular applications of a deeper rule which is rounded on natural justice.
Calcutta High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Babulal Choukhani And Sailendra Nath ... vs The King-Emperor on 17 February, 1938

promulgation can have been known." So also it has been applied in India in, for instance, matters arising under Rule 119 of the Defence of India Rules. See, for example, Crown v. Manghumal Tekuml(1), Shakoor v. King Emperor (2) and Babulal v. King Emperor (3). It is true none of these cases is analogous to the one before us but they are only particular applications of a deeper rule which is rounded on natural justice.
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 68 - Full Document
1