Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.23 seconds)Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013
5. My attention has also been drawn to the various judicial
pronouncements including Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & Ors.,
AIR 2014 SC 187; Lallan Chaudhary vs. State of Bihar, 2006 (3)
JCC 1731; & Radha vs. State of Delhi, 2011 (2) JCC 1414 to
show that when any complaint discloses commission of a
cognizable offence, the police is bound to register the FIR.
Lallan Chaudhary & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 12 October, 2006
5. My attention has also been drawn to the various judicial
pronouncements including Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & Ors.,
AIR 2014 SC 187; Lallan Chaudhary vs. State of Bihar, 2006 (3)
JCC 1731; & Radha vs. State of Delhi, 2011 (2) JCC 1414 to
show that when any complaint discloses commission of a
cognizable offence, the police is bound to register the FIR.
The Radha Soami Satsang Beas And Anr. vs The Delhi Administration And Anr. on 15 October, 2004
5. My attention has also been drawn to the various judicial
pronouncements including Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & Ors.,
AIR 2014 SC 187; Lallan Chaudhary vs. State of Bihar, 2006 (3)
JCC 1731; & Radha vs. State of Delhi, 2011 (2) JCC 1414 to
show that when any complaint discloses commission of a
cognizable offence, the police is bound to register the FIR.
Ramesh Kumar Soni vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 February, 2013
In Ramesh Kumari vs. State,
2006 Cri LJ 1622, it was held that -
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
1