Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.26 seconds)Section 74 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 202 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 73 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 75 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 213 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
M/S Jeevan Diesels & Electricals Ltd vs M/S Jasbir Singh Chadha (Huf) & Anr on 7 May, 2010
23.2 Plaintiff is already held entitled to recovery of only Rs.15 lakhs from
the defendants which is security deposit. The security has to be refunded
interest free at the time of completion of contract between the parties.
According to defendant the contract was not terminated by the defendant
and therefore he is not liable to pay any interest. In the present case it has
to be seen that whether contract between the parties had been terminated.
The plaintiff has not filed alongwith documents letter for cancellation of the
contract between the parties. However on the date of filing of the suit
plaintiff has claimed for refund of the security amount shows that the
plaintiff has exhibited his intention of termination of contract on the date of
filing of the suit. Notice of the same was given to the defendants. Hence
notice of the suit to the defendant is sufficient notice of termination of
contract between the parties as to principal and agent which is the law laid
down under citation titled as Jeevan Diesels & Electricals Ltd vs. Jasbir
Singh Chadha (HUF) & Anr. 2011 (183) DLT 712.
Abdul Rehman & Anr vs Mohd.Ruldu & Ors on 27 September, 2012
Abdul Rehman & Anr. v. Mohd. Ruldu & Ors. In Civil Appeal
Nos. 7043 of 2012 from Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.
24.5 It is noted that the amendment was allowed vide order dated
27.10.2006. The plea of the defendant is that the limitation shall begin to
apply as suit to be taken on the date
when the amendment was allowed is rejected in view of doctrine of relation
back.