Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.24 seconds)
Muhammad Yousuf Bhat vs State And (Of) J&K And Others And on 11 November, 2016 cites

The State Of Gujarat & Anr vs Suryakant Chunilal Shah on 3 December, 1998

39. Since the Committee herein had founded their opinion/satisfaction solely on the allegations contained in the two FIRs and, consequently, the impugned order was passed thereon, and, in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in State of Gujarat v. Suryakant Chunilal Shah (supra), since this Court has come to the conclusion that involvement of the petitioner in those criminal cases, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, would not constitute a relevant material for compulsory retiring the petitioner, coupled with the fact that there has been nothing adverse recorded in the petitioners ACRs/APRs, particularly of the years relevant to the registering of the FIRs, I deem it unnecessary to refer to, reproduce and discuss the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the judgments cited and relied upon by the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 134 - Full Document

Rajasthan State Road Tranp. Corp. & Ors vs Babu Lal Jangir on 16 September, 2013

In so far as the judgment of the Supreme Court in Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. v. Babu Lal Jangir (supra) is concerned, in that case the employee had been declared as deadwood on the basis of his service record which had nearly 19 cases of misconduct between the years 1978- 1990. The Supreme Court in its judgment detailed out the particulars of the 19 misconducts and the result of the enquiries conducted therein, and came to the conclusion that the record projected a dismal picture. The Supreme Court noticed that apart from the years 1978-90, the service record after 1990 also did not depict a rosy picture and that there was nothing to show that his performance had become better during the this period. While allowing the appeal filed by the employer, the Supreme Court in paragraph 28 of the judgment laid down as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 107 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Shakti Kumar Gupta vs State Of J&K on 10 February, 2016

44. The judgment of the Supreme Court in Shakti Kumar Gupta v. State of J&K (supra), governs an entirely different service. The principles laid down therein emanating from the Rules governing the higher judicial service and attributes of a judicial officer cannot be made applicable herein. Even so, as recorded in the judgment, the Full Court had found the petitioner therein to be incorrigible. That is not the case herein; there is no such finding recorded in the instant case.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next