Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.30 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 41 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological ... vs Smt. T. Sumalatha & Ors on 11 August, 2003
30. Although Mr. Singh wants us to determine and fix the quantum, we decline to do so for obvious reasons. We have no reason to suspect the intentions of first respondent. Moreso, when one revision vide circular dated 4th October 2000 has already been undertaken. It is not possible to accept the pleas of Mr. Singh that first respondent would continue to pay a low and meagre consolidated honorarium. It is inconceivable that first respondent will not act in accordance with the law laid down in the above decision. In this behalf we would reproduce the suggestions placed for our consideration by Mr. Singh. They read thus :
Apangshu Mohan Lodh And Ors vs State Of Tripura And Ors on 30 October, 2003
Central Inland Water ... vs Brojo Nath Ganguly & Anr on 6 April, 1986
In Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. and another v. Brojo Nath Ganguly and another the Supreme Court has observed that authorities, agencies as well as instrumentalities like first respondent are bound by the aforesaid mandate. Their actions, therefore, have to be in conformity with the same.