Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (0.69 seconds)Section 31 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Section 48 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 37 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
Explanation 2 to Section
34(2)(b)(ii) and Explanation 2 to Section 48(2)(b)(ii) was
added by the Amendment Act only so that Western Geco
(supra), as understood in Associate Builders (supra), and
paragraphs 28 and 29 in particular, is now done away with."
Psa Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd. vs The Board Of Trustees Of V.O. ... on 28 July, 2021
In PSA Sical Terminals [PSA Sical Terminals (P)
Ltd. v. V.O. Chidambranar Port Trust, (2021) 18 SCC 716 :
Ssangyong Engineering And ... vs National Highways Authority Of ... on 8 May, 2019
In Ssangyong Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI,
speaking for the Bench, R.F. Nariman, J. has spelt out the
contours of the limited scope of judicial interference in
reviewing the arbitral awards under the 1996 Act and
observed thus: (SCC pp. 169-71, paras 34-41)
"34. What is clear, therefore, is that the expression
"public policy of India", whether contained in Section
34 or in Section 48, would now mean the "fundamental
policy of Indian law" as explained in paras 18 and 27
of Associate Builders i.e. the fundamental policy of
Indian law would be relegated to "Renusagar"