Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.24 seconds)

State Of Gujarat vs Narendra K. Amin on 13 August, 2007

47. The judgments referred to by learned counsel Mr. Ravani were in the facts of the case as in the case of State (represented by the CBI v. Anil Sharma (supra) it was a case regarding disproportionate assets, whereas in the judgment in the case of State of Gujarat v. Narendra K. Amin (supra) the facts were totally different as the concerned police officer was found to have been directly involved in the main conspiracy/encounter.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 7 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document

Rasiklal vs Kishore on 20 February, 2009

43. Further, this aspect is also required to be considered in light of the fact that if the applicant is charged or suggested prima facie involvement for offence under sec. 201, which is a bailable offence, the same is required to be considered in light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Rasiklal v. Kishore s/o Khanchand Wadhwani (supra), wherein it has been observed, "The right to claim bail granted by Section 436 of the Code in a bailable offence is an absolute and indefeasible right. In bailable offences there is no question of discretion in granting bail as the words of Section 436 are imperative."
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 74 - J M Panchal - Full Document
1   2 3 Next