Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.98 seconds)Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 363 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 366A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
Pardeep Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 6 February, 2014
2. On receipt of above said intimation of marriage by
any police officer, necessary directions will be issued to
the concerned Police Station to take necessary steps in
accordance with law to enquire into the matter by
contracting the parents of both boy and girl. The matter
regarding age, consent of the girl and grievance of her
family will be determined. In the eventuality of any
complaint of kidnapping or abduction having been
received from any of the family members of the girl
generally the boy (husband) will not be arrested unless
and until the prejudicial statement is given by the girl
5 of 12
::: Downloaded on - 21-09-2024 13:29:57 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:117609
CRM M-27594 of 2024 -6-
(wife). Arrest should generally be deferred or avoided on
the immediate receipt of a complaint by the parents or
family members of the girl taking into consideration the
law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Joginder
Kumar's case (supra);
Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012
8. Thus, the law as it stands is that although High Court
can invoke its jurisdiction u/s.482 Cr.P.C. even in
noncompoundable offence and can quash the
proceedings on the basis of settlement arrived at
between the parties even in the cases of
non-compoundable offences but while exercising its
jurisdiction this Court must consider the fact that
whether the proceeding relates to any serious and
heinous offences and whether the crime in question has
impact over the society. In cases of serious nature which
affects the society at large this Court should not exercise
its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing
the proceedings on the basis of compromise executed
between the parties. (See decisions in Gian Singh v.
State of Punjab and Another reported in [(2012) 10
SCC 303], Narinder Singh and Others v. State of
Punjab and Another reported in [(2014).
State Of M.P vs Madanlal on 1 July, 2015
9 SCC 466],
Shimbhu v. State of Haryana reported in [AIR 2014
Supreme Court 739] (three Bench), State of Madhya
9 of 12
::: Downloaded on - 21-09-2024 13:29:57 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:117609
CRM M-27594 of 2024 -10-
Pradesh v. Madanlal reported in [AIR 2015 Supreme
Court 3003] (two Bench), Parbatbhai Aahir @
Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others v. State
of Gujarat and Another reported in [(2017) 9 SCC 641],
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan & Ors.
reported in [(2019) 5 SCC 688], Arun Singh and Others
v. State of Uttar Pradesh through its Secretary and
another reported in [(2020) (3) SCC 736], Ram Gopal
& another v. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in
[(2021 0 Supreme (SC) 529)], Daxaben v. The State of
Gujarat & others reported in [2022 LiveLaw (SC) 642],
P.Dharmraj v. Shanmugam and others decided on 8th
September 2022 in Crl.Appeal Nos.1515-1516 of 2022).
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai ... vs The State Of Gujarat on 4 October, 2017
9 SCC 466],
Shimbhu v. State of Haryana reported in [AIR 2014
Supreme Court 739] (three Bench), State of Madhya
9 of 12
::: Downloaded on - 21-09-2024 13:29:57 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:117609
CRM M-27594 of 2024 -10-
Pradesh v. Madanlal reported in [AIR 2015 Supreme
Court 3003] (two Bench), Parbatbhai Aahir @
Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others v. State
of Gujarat and Another reported in [(2017) 9 SCC 641],
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan & Ors.
reported in [(2019) 5 SCC 688], Arun Singh and Others
v. State of Uttar Pradesh through its Secretary and
another reported in [(2020) (3) SCC 736], Ram Gopal
& another v. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in
[(2021 0 Supreme (SC) 529)], Daxaben v. The State of
Gujarat & others reported in [2022 LiveLaw (SC) 642],
P.Dharmraj v. Shanmugam and others decided on 8th
September 2022 in Crl.Appeal Nos.1515-1516 of 2022).