Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 73 (0.93 seconds)Section 17 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd vs Essar Power Limited on 9 August, 2016
(iv) In Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Essar Power Ltd., reported in (2008) 4 SCC 755, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, at Paragraphs 52, 54, 55 and 56, held as follows:
Shri Balaganesan Metals vs Shri M.N. Shanmugham Chetty & Ors on 23 April, 1987
(Vide: Shri Balaganesan Metal v. M.N.Shanmugham Chettry & Ors., AIR 1987 SC 1668; and Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., v. Collector of Central Excise, Pune (2003) 3 SCC 506)."
Tara Chand & Ors vs Gram Panchayat Jhupa Khurd & Ors on 6 November, 2012
45. It is also worthwhile to extract Paragraph 8 in Tara Chand and others Vs. Gram Panchayat, Jhupa Khurd and others reported in 2012 (13) SCC 269, considered in A.L.Shah's case (cited supra),
"The word, any person has to be understood in the context that was intended by the legislature with respect to the tenancy Act, keeping in mind the purpose for which, the statute was enacted. The provisions of the Act, thus, have to be construed to achieve the purpose of its enactment. The Court has to adopt a constructive approach not contrary to attempted objective of the enactment. The Court must examine and give meaning to the said words, in view of the statute of which it is a part, considering the context and the subject of the said statute.
Section 14 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Competition Act, 2002
Poppatlal Shah vs The State Of Madras.Union Of India And ... on 30 March, 1953
In Poppatlal Shah v. State of Madras [AIR 1953 SC 274], this Court while construing the word `sale' appearing in the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 before its amendment in 1947, observed: "it is a settled rule of construction that to ascertain the legislative intent, all the constituent parts of a statutes are to be taken together, and each word, phrase or sentence is to be considered in the light of the general purpose of the Act itself".