Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.57 seconds)The Maharashtra Prohibition Act
T.Simson Prathab Singh vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 February, 2010
6. The dictum laid down in the above referred decisions is that the prosecution, in the case of offences under Prohibition Act, must establish through evidence that the bottles contained the prohibited liquor. In other words, the prosecution should establish that the commodity in question comes under one or other of the various items described in the definition of liquor in the Act. The mere affixing of labels on the bottles may not be a proof to hold that the petitioners were found selling the prohibited liquor as defined in the Prohibition Act. Therefore, the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioners by the Trial Court and confirmed by the first Appellate Court are not correct.
Pondicherry University Act, 1985
Simon & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2004
2) Simon and others Vs. State reported in 1996(2) CCR 313
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 401 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1