Babu Lal Prasad vs U.O.I & Ors 2002 (2) A.T.J Pg. 606 on 2 January, 2012
It was held by the C.A.T Allahabad Bench in the case of Babu Lal (supra) that:-
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)Raj Kumar Karwal vs Union Of India And Ors.Withkirpal Mohan ... on 21 March, 1990
11 The decision in the case of Raj Kamal (supra) passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi does not appear to much relevance in this case as it deals with regularization of casual labour and their right thereon. The case of the applicant is that he was engaged as Substitute Worker with full right of temporary workers and they were appointed on regular basis w.e.f. 17.8.2005 as per Department Rules relevant to such regularization.
Navjyoti Coo-Group Housing Society ... vs Union Of India And Others on 17 September, 1992
6. Thus, the inference from their pleadings is that they want to invoke the doctrine of legitimate expectation. The Apex Court has dealt with the doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in three cases (i) Navjyoti Co-operative Group Housing Society and ors Vs. UOI 1992 (4) SCC 477 (ii) Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries 1993 (1) SCC 71 and (iii) National Buildings Constructions Corporation Vs. S.P. Singh and Ors. 1998 SCC (l7S) 1770. It has been held therein that the essence of doctrine of legitimate expectation is fair play in administrative action. The State cannot unfairly disregarded its policy statements. The existence of legitimate expectation may have number of different consequences and one of such consequences is that the authority ought not to act to defeat the legitimate expectation..
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
1