Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.20 seconds)The Delhi Excise Act, 2009
S. L. Goswami vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 January, 1972
In the judgment titled as "S.L.Goswami v. State of M.P" reported as 1972
CRI.L.J.511(SC) the Hon'ble Supreme Court held:-
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Anoop Kumar Joshi vs The State Of Delhi on 12 January, 2017
20. It is repeatedly laid down by this court that in such cases it should be shown by the
police that sincere efforts have been made to join independent witnesses. In the
present case, it is evident that no such sincere efforts have been made, particularly
when we find that place was residential area and one or two persons from the locality
could have been persuaded to join the raiding party to witness the recovery being
made from the appellant. In case any of the public persons had declined to join the
raiding party, the police could have later on taken legal action against such persons
because they could not have escaped the rigours of law while declining to perform
their legal duty to assist the police in investigation as a citizen, which is an offence
under the IPC".
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 281 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 52 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
Haryana State Lotteries, Iqbal Chand ... vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 17 July, 1998
In case law Nanak Chand Vs. State of Delhi reported as DHC 1992 CRI LJ 55 it is
observed as under:-