Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.38 seconds)Section 29 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Cadila Healthcare Limited vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited on 26 March, 2001
25. The thrust of the arguments of the plaintiff in pressing home its
prayer for ad interim injunction on the plea of passing off is based
wholly on the contention concerning deceptive similarity basing such
submissions on the decision in the cases of Cadila Healthcare Ltd. vs.
CS (Comm) 1098/2016 Page 14 of 16
Cadila Pharma Ltd., (2001) 5 SCC 73; Neon Laboratories vs. Medical
Technologies, (2016) 2 SCC 672; Amritdhara Pharmacy Vs. Satyadeo
Gupta, AIR 1963 SC 449; Corn Products vs. Shangrila, AIR 1960 SC
142; and Mahindra Vs. Mahendra, AIR 2002 SC 117.
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. & ... vs Anglo French Drugs & Industries Ltd. & ... on 12 September, 2014
Neon Laboratories Ltd vs Medical Technologies Ltd. & Ors on 5 October, 2015
25. The thrust of the arguments of the plaintiff in pressing home its
prayer for ad interim injunction on the plea of passing off is based
wholly on the contention concerning deceptive similarity basing such
submissions on the decision in the cases of Cadila Healthcare Ltd. vs.
CS (Comm) 1098/2016 Page 14 of 16
Cadila Pharma Ltd., (2001) 5 SCC 73; Neon Laboratories vs. Medical
Technologies, (2016) 2 SCC 672; Amritdhara Pharmacy Vs. Satyadeo
Gupta, AIR 1963 SC 449; Corn Products vs. Shangrila, AIR 1960 SC
142; and Mahindra Vs. Mahendra, AIR 2002 SC 117.
Amritdhara Pharmacy vs Satyadeo Gupta on 27 April, 1962
25. The thrust of the arguments of the plaintiff in pressing home its
prayer for ad interim injunction on the plea of passing off is based
wholly on the contention concerning deceptive similarity basing such
submissions on the decision in the cases of Cadila Healthcare Ltd. vs.
CS (Comm) 1098/2016 Page 14 of 16
Cadila Pharma Ltd., (2001) 5 SCC 73; Neon Laboratories vs. Medical
Technologies, (2016) 2 SCC 672; Amritdhara Pharmacy Vs. Satyadeo
Gupta, AIR 1963 SC 449; Corn Products vs. Shangrila, AIR 1960 SC
142; and Mahindra Vs. Mahendra, AIR 2002 SC 117.
Corn Products Refining Co. vs Shangrila Food Products Ltd. on 8 October, 1959
25. The thrust of the arguments of the plaintiff in pressing home its
prayer for ad interim injunction on the plea of passing off is based
wholly on the contention concerning deceptive similarity basing such
submissions on the decision in the cases of Cadila Healthcare Ltd. vs.
CS (Comm) 1098/2016 Page 14 of 16
Cadila Pharma Ltd., (2001) 5 SCC 73; Neon Laboratories vs. Medical
Technologies, (2016) 2 SCC 672; Amritdhara Pharmacy Vs. Satyadeo
Gupta, AIR 1963 SC 449; Corn Products vs. Shangrila, AIR 1960 SC
142; and Mahindra Vs. Mahendra, AIR 2002 SC 117.