Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.81 seconds)
Chotu Miya, Shaik Faqruddin vs Mohammed Suleman,Goremiya on 17 November, 2023 cites

Prakash Rao Dandgey vs Satyanarayana Dandgey And Others on 4 September, 2014

12. It is observed in the impugned order that the case is coming up for trial. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 relied upon a decision delivered by the then composite High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Prakash Rao Dandgey v. Satyanrayana Dandgey 3, wherein it was observed that provision of amendment does not confer power on the Court to 3 MANU/AP/1742/2014 7 MGP,J Crp_6294_2018 allow an impleaded party to amend or alter the pleadings of another party already on record.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - C V Reddy - Full Document

Chilakani Venkata Rao vs Ch. Lakshman Rao And Ors. on 22 February, 2006

9. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the plaintiff Nos.20 to 23 that the trial Court erred in dismissing the amendment petition, which is filed consequent to the orders dated 18.10.2016 passed in I.A.No.430 of 2015, wherein the petitioners were transposed as plaintiff Nos.20 to 23. It is settled law that in a partition suit, all the parties, who are interested in the partition are treated as plaintiffs. For instance, even as per the affidavit of the petitioners in the amendment petition and the original plaint, plaintiff Nos.1 to 19 and defendant Nos.1 to 32 are shown as shareholders in suit 1CIVIL APPEAL arising out of SLP (C) No. 28377 OF 2018) decided on 14 March, 2023 5 MGP,J Crp_6294_2018 schedule property. The learned counsel for the respondents relied upon a decision rendered by the High Court for the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh in Chilakani Venkata Rao v. Lakshman Rao and others 2, wherein it was observed as under:
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 1 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1