Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)
Girish Kumar Gupta vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And ... on 10 February, 2023 cites

State Of U.P. vs Vijay Kumar Gupta And Others on 6 September, 2010

The present 482 Cr.P.C. application stands allowed. Keeping in view the compromise entered into between parties outside the court which has been duly verified by the Senior Registrar, High Court Lucknow Bench, Lucknow vide order dated 03.11.2022, the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the above referred judgment, the statements made by the learned counsel for the parties and the observation made herein above, the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.4341/2018 (Old Case No.6759/2004) State Vs Vijay Kumar Gupta and others, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitapur and the impugned charge-sheet arising out of Case Crime No.480/2004 under Sections 420, 406 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali, District Sitapur as well as summoning order dated 18.10.2014 and Bailable Warrant order dated 06.03.2019 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitapur in the aforesaid case are hereby quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

S.W. Palanitkar And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 18 October, 2001

In S.W. Palankattkar & others Vs. State of Bihar, 2002 (44) ACC 168, it has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that quashing of the criminal proceedings is an exception than a rule. The inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C itself envisages three circumstances under which the inherent jurisdiction may be exercised:-(i) to give effect an order under the Code, (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of the court ; (iii) to otherwise secure the ends of justice. The power of High Court is very wide but should be exercised very cautiously to do real and substantial justice for which the court alone exists.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 2481 - Full Document
1   2 Next