Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.36 seconds)
Beena Choudhary Wife Of Shri Jeet Singh vs Jaipur Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd on 3 November, 2023 cites

Abhyudya Sanstha vs Union Of India & Ors on 12 May, 2011

24. The writ petitions filed by the purported occupiers of plots in PRN scheme, apart from the reasons already mentioned above, also calls for no interference on account of concealment and suppression of material facts. It is a well settled principle of law that one who seeks equity must also do equity. It is equally well settled that one who seeks to invoke the extra ordinary jurisdiction of the Courts must come with not just clean hands, but also with clean mind, clean heart and clean objective, as these are the equi-fundamentals of judicious litigation. A litigant is bound to make full and true disclosure of facts. Reliance in this regard can be placed on a catena of judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court, including Tilokchand H.B. Motichand and Ors. vs. Munshi and Anr.: (1969) 1 SCC 110; A. Shanmugam vs. Ariya Kshatriya Rajakula Vamsathu Madalaya Nandhavana Paripalanai Sangam and Anr.: (2012) 6 SCC 430; Chandra Shashi vs. Anil Kumar Verma: (1995) 1 SCC 421; Abhyudya Sanstha vs. Union of India and Ors.: (2011) 6 SCC 145; State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Narmada Bachao Andolan and Anr.:
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 189 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

State Of M.P vs Narmada Bachao Andolan & Anr on 29 September, 2011

24. The writ petitions filed by the purported occupiers of plots in PRN scheme, apart from the reasons already mentioned above, also calls for no interference on account of concealment and suppression of material facts. It is a well settled principle of law that one who seeks equity must also do equity. It is equally well settled that one who seeks to invoke the extra ordinary jurisdiction of the Courts must come with not just clean hands, but also with clean mind, clean heart and clean objective, as these are the equi-fundamentals of judicious litigation. A litigant is bound to make full and true disclosure of facts. Reliance in this regard can be placed on a catena of judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court, including Tilokchand H.B. Motichand and Ors. vs. Munshi and Anr.: (1969) 1 SCC 110; A. Shanmugam vs. Ariya Kshatriya Rajakula Vamsathu Madalaya Nandhavana Paripalanai Sangam and Anr.: (2012) 6 SCC 430; Chandra Shashi vs. Anil Kumar Verma: (1995) 1 SCC 421; Abhyudya Sanstha vs. Union of India and Ors.: (2011) 6 SCC 145; State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Narmada Bachao Andolan and Anr.:
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 425 - J M Panchal - Full Document

Kalyaneshwari vs U.O.I. & Ors on 21 January, 2011

(2011) 7 SCC 639; Kalyaneshwari vs. Union of India and Anr.: (2011) 3 SCC 287; Kishore Samrite vs. State of U.P. (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 09:09:53 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:31410] (29 of 32) [WMAP-115/2019] and Ors.: (2013) 2 SCC 398; K.D. Sharma vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors.: (2008) 12 SCC 481; Amar Singh vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2011) 7 SCC 69; Ramjas Foundation and Anr vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2010) 14 SCC 38; Anil Bansal vs. Ashok Kumar Bansal and Ors.: (2005) 9 SCC 368; S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs. vs. Jagannath (Dead) by L.Rs. and Ors.: (1994) 1 SCC 1; A.V. Papayya Sastry and Ors. vs. Government of A.P. and Ors.: (2007) 4 SCC 221; and K. Jayaram and Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors.: (2022) 12 SCC
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 103 - S Kumar - Full Document

Kishore Samrite vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 18 October, 2012

(2011) 7 SCC 639; Kalyaneshwari vs. Union of India and Anr.: (2011) 3 SCC 287; Kishore Samrite vs. State of U.P. (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 09:09:53 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:31410] (29 of 32) [WMAP-115/2019] and Ors.: (2013) 2 SCC 398; K.D. Sharma vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors.: (2008) 12 SCC 481; Amar Singh vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2011) 7 SCC 69; Ramjas Foundation and Anr vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2010) 14 SCC 38; Anil Bansal vs. Ashok Kumar Bansal and Ors.: (2005) 9 SCC 368; S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs. vs. Jagannath (Dead) by L.Rs. and Ors.: (1994) 1 SCC 1; A.V. Papayya Sastry and Ors. vs. Government of A.P. and Ors.: (2007) 4 SCC 221; and K. Jayaram and Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors.: (2022) 12 SCC
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 408 - S Kumar - Full Document

K.D.Sharma vs Steel Authorities Of India Ltd.& Ors on 9 July, 2008

(2011) 7 SCC 639; Kalyaneshwari vs. Union of India and Anr.: (2011) 3 SCC 287; Kishore Samrite vs. State of U.P. (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 09:09:53 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:31410] (29 of 32) [WMAP-115/2019] and Ors.: (2013) 2 SCC 398; K.D. Sharma vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors.: (2008) 12 SCC 481; Amar Singh vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2011) 7 SCC 69; Ramjas Foundation and Anr vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2010) 14 SCC 38; Anil Bansal vs. Ashok Kumar Bansal and Ors.: (2005) 9 SCC 368; S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs. vs. Jagannath (Dead) by L.Rs. and Ors.: (1994) 1 SCC 1; A.V. Papayya Sastry and Ors. vs. Government of A.P. and Ors.: (2007) 4 SCC 221; and K. Jayaram and Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors.: (2022) 12 SCC
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 513 - C K Thakker - Full Document

Amar Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 11 May, 2011

In view of the foregoing analysis, this Court is of the firm view that if the condition F of the judgment of Sugan Singh (supra) were to be relaxed, the same would be against the tenet of planned development of PRN scheme, as directed by Co- ordinate Bench and Division Bench of this Court, especially since it remains undisputed that the directions were passed in the larger public interest.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 234 - Full Document

Ramjas Foundation & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 9 November, 2010

(2011) 7 SCC 639; Kalyaneshwari vs. Union of India and Anr.: (2011) 3 SCC 287; Kishore Samrite vs. State of U.P. (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 09:09:53 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:31410] (29 of 32) [WMAP-115/2019] and Ors.: (2013) 2 SCC 398; K.D. Sharma vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors.: (2008) 12 SCC 481; Amar Singh vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2011) 7 SCC 69; Ramjas Foundation and Anr vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2010) 14 SCC 38; Anil Bansal vs. Ashok Kumar Bansal and Ors.: (2005) 9 SCC 368; S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs. vs. Jagannath (Dead) by L.Rs. and Ors.: (1994) 1 SCC 1; A.V. Papayya Sastry and Ors. vs. Government of A.P. and Ors.: (2007) 4 SCC 221; and K. Jayaram and Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors.: (2022) 12 SCC
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 314 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) By ... vs Jagannath (Dead) By L.Rs. And Others on 27 October, 1993

(2011) 7 SCC 639; Kalyaneshwari vs. Union of India and Anr.: (2011) 3 SCC 287; Kishore Samrite vs. State of U.P. (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 09:09:53 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:31410] (29 of 32) [WMAP-115/2019] and Ors.: (2013) 2 SCC 398; K.D. Sharma vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors.: (2008) 12 SCC 481; Amar Singh vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2011) 7 SCC 69; Ramjas Foundation and Anr vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2010) 14 SCC 38; Anil Bansal vs. Ashok Kumar Bansal and Ors.: (2005) 9 SCC 368; S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs. vs. Jagannath (Dead) by L.Rs. and Ors.: (1994) 1 SCC 1; A.V. Papayya Sastry and Ors. vs. Government of A.P. and Ors.: (2007) 4 SCC 221; and K. Jayaram and Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors.: (2022) 12 SCC
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 1512 - K Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next