Court In The Case Of Secretary, State Of ... vs . Uma on 9 April, 2015
Date: 2025.10.21 14:40:59+05'30'
Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2024.4.0
OA Nos.2045/2014, 651/2013, 729/2019 &
2220/2016 have filed Contempt Petition
No.2017/2020 in OA No.2045/2014 before this
Tribunal and the department filed compliance
report stating therein that none of the
daily wagers/causal employees have been
replaced by another set of daily
wagers/causal employees and further stated
that none of the applicants fulfilled the
Page 7 of 10
8 OA Nos.2214/2017 &
882/2019
criteria required for regularization as laid
down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case
of Uma Devi (supra). On the basis of reply filed
by the respondents, the Tribunal was pleased
to dismiss the Contempt Petition filed by the
applicants. It has been submitted that the
applicants in these OAs are relitigating the
same issue which has already been decided by
the Tribunal in OA Nos.2045/2014, 651/2013,
729/2019 & 2220/2016. Hence, the applicants
are not entitled for any relief and the
present OAs are liable to be dismissed.
Digitally signed by Milan Jackson Alphanso
Milan Jackson