Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)The Drugs And Cosmetics Act, 1940
Section 37 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
State Of Maharashtra vs Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao on 29 September, 1989
5. The previous petition filed by the petitioner for grant of regular bail
had been dismissed vide order dated 05.08.2025. It is well settled proposition of
law that when successive bail applications come before the Court, the Court
should be very cautious while considering the same. Successive bail applications
can be entertained by the Court when some substantial change is established by
the accused thereby making him entitled for grant of bail. Reference in this
regard can be made to State of Maharashtra Vs. Captain Buddhikota Subha
Rao, AIR 1989 Supreme Court, 2292, wherein it was observed so and it was
further held that the Court should not pass an order of release of an accused on
bail in successive bail application merely establishing some cosmetic change
between time gap of two applications. There must be some drastic change
during the period between two applications.
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan Alias Pappu Yadav & Anr on 12 March, 2004
Reference can also be made to
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar Vs. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav and another
(2004) 7 SCC 528, wherein it was observed by Hon'ble Supreme Court that
where the offence alleged against an accused is grave, bail cannot be granted
only on the ground of long incarceration.
1